← Back to the feed

Trump gets hero’s welcome by rowdy MAGA partiers as he kicks off first-ever GOP midterm convention… with several glaring absences

Developed over time first seen 4 weeks ago

Daily Mail ·

Donald Trump kicked off the Republican Party's first-ever midterm convention in Dallas by promising a $5,000 "Trump Dividend" for every American adult if the GOP holds both chambers of Congress in November, framing the estimated $1 trillion payout as a shareholder-style reward for economic success, provided recipients spend it domestically. He urged supporters to treat the midterms as a referendum on himself despite not being on the ballot, reflecting how closely the party's fortunes remain tied to his standing as Democrats look to exploit his weak approval ratings. The event nonetheless exposed strains within the GOP, with notable absences suggesting a less than unified front heading into the elections.

More than 20,000 people attended the opening night at the American Airlines Center, with Trump repeating his false claim to have won the 2020 election and mocking Democrats over voter ID policy, while also praising embattled Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton. Senate Majority Leader John Thune skipped the convention amid reported friction with Trump over stalled legislation, and vulnerable Republicans including Maine's Susan Collins, Iowa's Ashley Hinson and New Hampshire's John E. Sununu also stayed away from the main stage. The build-up was further marred by a lobbyist describing the "very bad" vibes, attendees queuing in 95-degree heat, and Trump's arrival being delayed after an emergency slide deployed on his Air Force One, though the crowd still gave him an enthusiastic reception once he took the stage.

  • Trump pledges $5,000 "dividend" to all Americans if GOP holds Congress
  • Senate leader Thune and several vulnerable Republicans skipped the convention
  • Trump's arrival was delayed after an Air Force One emergency slide deployed

New here? Start with this

Trump's midterm convention marks the first time a US president's party has held a dedicated national gathering midway through a term, rather than waiting for the next presidential race. Republicans currently control both the House and Senate by narrow margins, and this November's elections will decide whether they keep that grip or lose ground to the Democrats, who need to flip only a handful of seats to take back one or both chambers.

Although Trump is not up for election himself, midterm results are traditionally read as a verdict on the sitting president, which is why he has been framing the vote as being about him personally. Key Senate contests to watch include Maine, Ohio, Michigan and Alaska, where vulnerable Republican incumbents are trying to hold their seats, alongside a competitive Texas race featuring Ken Paxton, the state's attorney general.

The event has also exposed friction inside the Republican Party. Senior figures such as Senate Majority Leader John Thune and several senators facing tough re-election fights have kept their distance from the convention stage, a sign of the balancing act elected Republicans face between showing loyalty to Trump and protecting their own standing with voters back home.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters would argue that Trump remains the single most energising figure in American politics, capable of filling arenas and driving turnout in a way no other Republican can match, and that leaning into his popularity with his base is simply sound electoral strategy in a midterm cycle where enthusiasm often decides close races. They would say bold pledges like a taxpayer dividend reflect a results-focused, unconventional style that resonated with voters in previous elections, and that his willingness to fight combatively on issues like voter ID reflects genuine conviction rather than mere provocation. From this view, the absence of a few establishment figures from the stage is a minor logistical footnote, not evidence of a party in crisis.

The case against

Critics, including some within the party, would argue that building an entire midterm convention around one man's persona risks nationalising local races and distracting from the practical concerns of swing voters, particularly when vulnerable incumbents in tight states may need distance rather than proximity to him to win. They would contend that repeating disputed claims about past elections and using coarse language toward opponents undermines the party's credibility with moderates and independents whose support is often decisive in close Senate contests. The visible absence of leaders like the Senate Majority Leader and several at-risk senators, in this view, signals a genuine and reasonable strategic calculation that some candidates' paths to victory run through demonstrating independence rather than loyalty to Trump.

More coverage

Art Culture Elections Government Politics World

Read the full article at the source →