Trump proposal would exclude some noncitizens from 2030 census and end race data collection
The Trump administration is moving towards a rule that would exclude millions of noncitizens without green cards from the 2030 US census and stop the questionnaire collecting race and ethnicity data. The change could affect how congressional seats and district boundaries are allocated, as well as federal funding for services, while critics say it may conflict with the Constitution and deter people from taking part.
The Commerce Department posted the proposal to the Federal Register last month, with public comments open until 2 November, the day before Election Day. It would cover people in the US on student visas or Temporary Protected Status, as well as asylum seekers and refugees. Trump tried a similar census change during his first term, which courts blocked; New York Attorney General Letitia James says her office is considering a challenge.
- Proposed rule would exclude many noncitizens from the 2030 census.
- It would also remove race and ethnicity questions.
- Critics warn of legal challenges and effects on funding and representation.
New here? Start with this
The US census is a count of everyone living in the country, carried out every ten years. Its figures help determine how many seats each state gets in the House of Representatives, shape electoral districts and guide the distribution of federal money for public services.
The Commerce Department oversees the census, while the Federal Register is where the US government publishes proposed rules and invites public comment. The proposal concerns people without green cards, including some students, asylum seekers, refugees and people with Temporary Protected Status; state officials such as New York Attorney General Letitia James can challenge federal actions in court.
The Constitution requires a census, but how it is conducted and what it asks can be disputed. A similar effort during Trump’s first term was blocked by courts, and the debate over who is counted and what information is collected matters because it can affect representation, funding and people’s willingness to respond.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters could argue that congressional representation should reflect the electorate and that a census focused on citizens and permanent residents would better serve that purpose. They may also see ending race and ethnicity questions as a way to limit government classification by race, while leaving demographic data to other sources.
The case against
Opponents could argue that the census is meant to count everyone living in the country, and excluding noncitizens would distort population-based representation and funding for communities where they live. They may also contend that race and ethnicity data are essential for monitoring discrimination and directing services, and that changing the questions or eligibility rules could deter participation and undermine the count.
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Daily Mail as “Trump moves to strip noncitizens from 2030 census in explosive plan that could redraw America’s political map”.