← Back to the feed

Volkswagen board approves plan to cut another 50,000 jobs

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

BBC World ·

Volkswagen's board has approved a plan to cut a further 50,000 jobs, bringing total planned reductions to 100,000 roles by 2030 in what chief executive Oliver Blume called the biggest restructuring in the firm's nearly nine-decade history. The move, first signalled by Blume in July and building on 50,000 cuts announced in March, comes as the German carmaker battles falling profits, weaker sales in China and the US, and fierce competition from Chinese rivals such as BYD. Shares in Volkswagen rose around 7% in Frankfurt on the day of the announcement, and IG Metall union president Christianne Benner said the company had "fought hard for good solutions" to address a "crisis situation".

Alongside the job losses, which include management positions, Volkswagen said it would halve its range of models and cut production complexity by 75% by 2035, focusing output on its "most compelling vehicles" to lower costs. The group, which employed more than 660,000 people worldwide as of 2025 across brands including Audi, Porsche, Skoda, Seat, Bentley and Lamborghini, is also reviewing the future of four German plants — Emden, Zwickau, Hanover and Neckarsulm — where production capacity exceeds demand, saying alternative uses for the sites are being assessed.

  • VW to cut 100,000 jobs total by 2030 after new 50,000-role reduction
  • Cuts respond to falling profits amid Chinese and US competition
  • VW to halve its model range and review four German plants

New here? Start with this

Volkswagen is Germany's largest carmaker and one of the biggest in the world, owning brands such as Audi, Porsche, Skoda, Seat, Bentley and Lamborghini. It employs more than 660,000 people globally and has long been central to the German economy, so decisions about its size and structure carry weight far beyond the company itself.

The firm has been struggling with falling profits, softer demand in key markets like China and the United States, and growing pressure from lower-cost Chinese electric car makers such as BYD. Oliver Blume, Volkswagen's chief executive, has been pushing a restructuring drive to cut costs, and the company's workforce and strategy decisions are shaped jointly by management, its supervisory board and powerful labour unions such as IG Metall.

Job cuts at Volkswagen are especially sensitive because German law gives workers and unions a strong formal role in company decision-making, and the firm's factories are major employers in the regions where they operate. Any large reduction in jobs or production therefore has knock-on effects for local economies, suppliers and the wider debate about the future of Germany's car industry.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Advocates of the plan argue that Volkswagen faces a genuine structural crisis: falling profits, weakening demand in China and the US, and fast-moving Chinese rivals such as BYD that undercut it on cost and electric technology. From this view, carrying an oversized, complex model range and surplus manufacturing capacity built for a different era is unsustainable, and delaying painful restructuring would only risk a slower, more chaotic decline that could ultimately threaten far more jobs. Simplifying the model line-up and right-sizing plants and management, they contend, is a necessary act of stewardship to preserve a leaner, competitive Volkswagen for the long term, and the involvement of union figures in shaping the deal suggests an attempt to manage decline responsibly rather than recklessly.

The case against

Critics, including many within the workforce and its union representatives, argue that cutting 100,000 jobs by 2030 imposes an enormous human cost on employees and the communities built around plants like Emden, Zwickau, Hanover and Neckarsulm, many of whom have given decades of loyalty to the company. They contend that management strategy and prior investment decisions bear significant responsibility for the current crisis, and that workers should not be made to shoulder the heaviest burden of correcting those mistakes through job losses and plant uncertainty. From this perspective, there is also concern that such deep cuts could hollow out engineering expertise and morale precisely when Volkswagen needs skilled people to compete, and that alternative paths – such as slower attrition, shorter hours, or greater state and shareholder support – deserved fuller consideration before resorting to cuts of this scale.

More coverage

Business Economy World

Read the full article at the source →