Why I’m Suing to Block the Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger (Guest Column)
Developed over time first seen 2 months ago
California Attorney General Rob Bonta explains, in this guest column, why he is leading a coalition of 12 state attorneys general in suing to block the proposed $110 billion merger between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery. He argues the deal is unlawful and would hand one company excessive control over film and television distribution, threatening competition, consumer prices, content quality and the diversity of voices in journalism and storytelling.
Bonta writes that combining two of the five largest film distributors and two of the five largest basic cable owners would give the merged company control of nearly a third of theatrical movie distribution, over 30% of blockbuster releases, and around 50 major cable channels spanning news, sports and entertainment. He warns this consolidation would reduce the number of journalists and independent voices, discourage risk-taking on creative projects, and ultimately harm both the entertainment industry and democratic discourse, pointing to the historic rivalry between the two studios that produced films such as "Titanic," "The Godfather" and "Barbie."
- Bonta leads 12 states suing to block $110bn Paramount-Warner Bros. merger
- Merger would control nearly a third of film and cable distribution
- Bonta warns of higher prices, less competition, fewer independent voices
New here? Start with this
Rob Bonta is California's Attorney General, and he is leading a group of twelve state attorneys general in a lawsuit aimed at stopping a proposed $110 billion merger between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery, two of the biggest names in American film and television.
The two companies are among the largest distributors of films and owners of cable television channels in the United States, so combining them would concentrate a large share of movie releases and cable networks, including news, sports and entertainment channels, under one owner. Such deals typically require regulatory or legal approval, and opponents can challenge them in court on the grounds that they harm competition.
The case matters because it touches on how much choice and variety audiences have in what they watch, how much power one company can hold over pricing and distribution in the entertainment industry, and how media consolidation might affect the number of independent journalists and voices in circulation.
More coverage
Business Companies Research Science
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Variety as “Why I’m Suing to Block the Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger (Guest Column)”.