Why your Ring camera is still useful without a subscription

Engadget ·

Ring cameras can still be useful without a paid subscription, mainly as live doorbells and intercoms. Owners can check who is at the door and speak to visitors through the app, which can help when they are away, monitoring children or checking on pets.

Ring’s paid plans start at $4.99 a month and are needed to access saved footage, which may matter if someone wants evidence of a stolen parcel. The article also notes privacy concerns around facial recognition and AI features, a lawsuit over alleged collection of facial data, and the end of Ring’s 2025 partnership with Flock Safety. Ring says a recent software update gives owners control over access to videos through rotating encryption keys.

In short

  • Live viewing and two-way talk work without a subscription.
  • Saved footage requires a paid plan, starting at $4.99 monthly.
  • Ring’s AI features and data practices have raised privacy concerns.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

A Ring camera can still provide practical value without a subscription: owners can see who is at the door and speak to visitors remotely, which may help them manage deliveries, check on children or pets, and respond when away. For people who mainly want a live doorbell and intercom, those everyday uses may justify the device without paying a monthly fee.

The case against

Without a subscription, owners cannot access saved footage, which may limit the camera’s usefulness when they need to review an incident or document a stolen parcel. The recurring fee may therefore be worthwhile for people who want a record of events, while concerns about facial recognition, AI and access to video may lead others to question whether the added capabilities are worth the privacy trade-offs.

Art Culture

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion