Would-be Tory MPs must believe in ‘fundamental’ need for Britain to quit ECHR in order to be candidate at next election – Philp

Daily Mail ·

Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said prospective Conservative parliamentary candidates for the next general election should believe in the “fundamental” need for Britain to leave the European Convention on Human Rights. His comments matter because they signal a possible tightening of the party’s stance on human rights law and immigration, and suggest that support for quitting the ECHR could become a test of ideological alignment within the Conservatives.

Philp’s remarks indicate that backing withdrawal from the ECHR may be treated as a core principle for future Tory candidates rather than just one policy position among many. The issue has become politically significant because some Conservatives argue the convention limits the UK’s ability to control immigration and deport foreign offenders, while critics warn that leaving it would have major legal, diplomatic and constitutional consequences. The intervention also points to continuing debate inside the party over how sharply it should define its platform before the next election.

In short

  • Philp wants Tory candidates to back leaving the ECHR
  • The stance could shape candidate selection
  • ECHR policy remains a major Tory dividing line

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

The ECHR constrains British sovereign decision-making by subordinating UK courts to a European institution, undermining parliamentary democracy and voters' ability to control their own laws. More fundamentally, it restricts the government's capacity to manage immigration and national security by preventing deportations the UK considers necessary; establishing this as a core principle for candidates ensures the party has a clear mandate to reclaim these powers and govern according to its electoral platform rather than being continually stymied by judges interpreting a 70-year-old treaty not designed for modern circumstances.

The case against

Withdrawing from the ECHR would damage Britain's international relationships with European allies, complicate security cooperation, and strip away a framework that has protected British citizens' fundamental rights for decades. Rather than making ECHR withdrawal a litmus test for candidates, the party should allow legitimate debate on how to balance sovereignty with rights protection, as many thoughtful conservatives support reform rather full withdrawal, and imposing ideological uniformity on this complex constitutional question risks selecting for dogmatism over prudent governance whilst undermining the party's credibility on constitutional stewardship.

Explained simply

The European Convention on Human Rights is an international agreement that protects civil liberties such as freedom from torture, the right to a fair trial and freedom of speech. Britain has been bound by this convention since 1951, and the rights it guarantees are incorporated into UK law through the Human Rights Act, which courts use to judge whether government action is lawful.

Chris Philp is the Conservative Party's shadow home secretary, meaning he would lead the Home Office if the Conservatives win the next election. He has suggested that all prospective Conservative parliamentary candidates should believe Britain must leave the convention, signalling that support for withdrawal could become a defining principle of party membership rather than simply one debated policy option.

The issue has become contentious because some Conservatives argue the convention prevents the UK from deporting foreign offenders and restricts immigration control as they wish, whilst others warn that leaving would complicate Britain's legal relationships with its allies and could weaken protections for ordinary people. The remarks suggest the Conservative Party may be moving towards requiring stricter ideological alignment on the issue before the next general election.

Art Business Culture Elections Europe Markets Politics UK World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion