Kelly Clarkson disputes New York shop’s account of $15,000 mechanical bird sale
Developed over time first seen 1 day ago
Kelly Clarkson and Brooklyn curiosity shop Art of Play have given conflicting accounts of a conversation about a $15,000 mechanical bird called Molly. Clarkson says a staff member treated her as though she could not afford it, prompting her to complain on X; the dispute drew attention to the shop and its response.
Art of Play says Molly was not for sale, but that a matching bird by a Seattle artist was available for $15,000, and that it has contacted Clarkson to try to clear up what it calls a misunderstanding. Clarkson disputes the shop’s account, saying they discussed the price and availability, and accused the staff member of rudeness and lying. She says she supports small businesses, while the shop said it was surprised by the reaction from her 8.8 million followers.
- Clarkson and Art of Play disagree over a $15,000 mechanical bird.
- The shop says Molly was not for sale, but her matching twin was.
- Art of Play says it has contacted Clarkson to resolve the misunderstanding.
New here? Start with this
Mechanical birds are intricate moving artworks designed to imitate the appearance or motion of real birds. They are often made by specialist artists and can be sold through galleries or curiosity shops, with prices varying widely according to their materials and craftsmanship.
Kelly Clarkson is a singer and television presenter whose large public profile means her comments on social media can reach millions of people. Art of Play is a Brooklyn shop that sells unusual objects, including mechanical art. The disagreement centres on what its staff told Clarkson about a bird called Molly and a similar bird said to be available for $15,000.
The story matters because it raises questions about how a customer interaction was handled and how a business responds to a public complaint. It also shows how quickly a dispute involving a well-known person and a small shop can attract widespread attention.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Clarkson’s account, if accurate, raises a fair concern that customers should be treated respectfully and that a shop should communicate clearly about whether an item is for sale. Her public complaint may also be seen as a way to hold a business accountable after she felt the conversation was denied.
The case against
The shop’s account suggests Molly herself was not for sale, while a comparable bird by the same artist was available, so the disagreement may stem from a misunderstanding rather than deliberate discourtesy. A public accusation can have serious consequences for a small business, making it reasonable to seek clarification and resolution before concluding that staff lied or acted dismissively.
More coverage
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “‘Wow, dude. You’re an idiot’: why Kelly Clarkson is fighting over a $15,000 bird on social media”.