Video games news, releases, esports and culture — all the biggest gaming stories in one place.
Yet another price rise: AMD will reportedly raise its graphics card and memory prices alongside Nvidia
AMD is reportedly set to raise prices on its graphics cards and memory products, following a similar move by rival Nvidia. According to industry analyst Harukaze5719, AMD deliberately waited for Nvidia to increase its prices first, so as to avoid losing competitiveness or market share by moving prematurely during a period of high demand. The increases matter because they add to a broader run of price rises across gaming hardware, driven largely by AI datacentres consuming vast amounts of component stock.
AMD has reportedly told manufacturers to expect a price increase of at least 10% across its product range, taking effect from the start of August, with pricing expected to land in a similar position to Nvidia's cards. Nvidia was reported last week to be raising graphics card and component prices by 20–30%, with Samsung said to be planning comparable increases for memory units. Harukaze5719 also cited a weak recovery in the consumer GPU market, high price sensitivity among buyers, and leftover inventory as contributing factors. The knock-on effects extend to consoles, with Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft all having raised prices post-launch, raising fears that future consoles could approach £1,000.
In short
- AMD reportedly to raise GPU and memory prices by at least 10%, from August.
- Move follows Nvidia's reported 20-30% price hikes on graphics cards.
- AI datacentre demand is squeezing component supply and pushing up prices.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Companies operating in genuine supply-constrained markets must adjust pricing rationally to balance demand with limited production. AI datacentre demand is consuming substantial component stock at premium prices, creating real scarcity for consumer hardware. With a weakened consumer GPU recovery and inventory challenges, manufacturers face legitimate cost pressures and margin compression that justify price adjustments. Failure to adjust pricing in such conditions risks unsustainable losses that would undermine future investment and innovation.
The case against
These coordinated price rises lack the character of independent competitive responses—AMD explicitly waiting for Nvidia before raising its own prices suggests sequential price-setting rather than genuine market competition. Whilst supply constraints exist, companies could choose to absorb costs or invest differently rather than maximising near-term margins entirely at consumer expense. The cascading effect across GPUs, memory, and consoles creates an affordability crisis for the gaming community, representing a choice to prioritise shareholder returns over community access at a moment when consumer loyalty and goodwill matter.
Explained simply
Graphics cards process the visuals in computers and games, while memory stores data that devices need to use quickly. AMD and Nvidia are the main suppliers of graphics cards for consumer PCs, and their products compete for buyers; Samsung is among the companies that make memory chips.
Demand for these components has grown as companies build data centres for artificial intelligence, putting pressure on supplies available to electronics makers. Price changes can affect the cost of building or upgrading a gaming PC, and can also feed into the cost of other devices that use the same components.