← Back to the feed

Zach Bryan wears Palestinian solidarity shirt at Gillette amid Macklemore ban

Developed over time first seen 5 days ago

Rolling Stone ·

Zach Bryan wore a “Free Palestine” shirt during the first of two shows at Gillette Stadium, drawing attention to owner Robert Kraft’s decision to bar Macklemore from the venue. Macklemore had said Kraft pressured Ed Sheeran to remove him from Sheeran’s stadium tour after his pro-Palestinian remarks and performance in New Jersey.

Kraft confirmed the Gillette ban, citing Macklemore’s onstage actions, but did not address the claim that he contacted other stadium owners. Macklemore had expressed solidarity with Palestinians and performed “Hind’s Hall”; artists supporting Sheeran withdrew from the stadium dates. Macklemore later announced his own Free Palestine Tour had sold out, while Bryan was scheduled to return to Gillette for a second show.

  • Zach Bryan wore a “Free Palestine” shirt at Gillette Stadium.
  • The gesture followed Robert Kraft’s ban on Macklemore.
  • Macklemore said his own Free Palestine Tour sold out.

New here? Start with this

Rapper Macklemore performed at an Ed Sheeran concert in early September, where he expressed public support for Palestine by displaying conflict imagery and performing a protest song. His activism prompted backlash from pro-Israel advocacy groups.

Robert Kraft, owner of Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts, responded by banning Macklemore from performing at his venue and removing him from the remainder of Ed Sheeran's stadium tour. Several other touring artists, including producer Finneas, announced they would withdraw from Kraft-affiliated events in protest.

The incident has highlighted tensions within the entertainment industry over how artists should handle activism relating to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The dispute reflects differing views amongst artists, venue owners and advocacy groups about free expression and which performers should be permitted to perform.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Artists should retain freedom to speak on matters of documented humanitarian concern, and Gaza represents a civilian crisis deserving of public advocacy. Restricting such speech based on business relationships or political pressure effectively suppresses legitimate voices on international injustice, setting a concerning precedent for which causes remain speakable. The activism concerned civilian suffering rather than hostility toward particular groups, and subsequent commercial success indicates substantial public sympathy for these concerns.

The case against

Venue owners have legitimate rights to control their properties and avoid becoming platforms for partisan activism on issues where reasonable people profoundly disagree about the underlying conflict. The Israel-Palestine situation involves genuinely contested narratives and legitimate concerns on multiple sides; commercial venues can reasonably maintain neutrality rather than amplifying particular political perspectives. Kraft's decision did not silence these artists, who retained other platforms and subsequently toured successfully, but rather protected his business from becoming a flashpoint for contentious geopolitical activism.

More coverage

Entertainment Music

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by Rolling Stone as “Zach Bryan Wears ‘Free Palestine’ Shirt at Gillette After Owner Robert Kraft Banned Macklemore”.