← Back to the feed

Zach Bryan and band wear pro-Palestinian shirts at Gillette Stadium

Developed over time first seen 1 week ago

Billboard ·

Zach Bryan wore a “Free Palestine” T-shirt during a concert at Gillette Stadium, and members of his band were seen wearing matching shirts. The gesture attracted attention because the stadium is owned by the Kraft Group, whose leader Robert Kraft had confirmed his role in Macklemore’s removal from Ed Sheeran’s US tour after Macklemore made pro-Palestinian statements onstage.

Bryan did not appear to address the shirts during the show, and Kraft had not publicly responded. Macklemore was removed from the remaining US dates after stadium owners reportedly threatened to withdraw shows; Kraft said he believed a line had been crossed on antisemitism while acknowledging Palestinian suffering, and Sheeran said the decision was made by the promoter. Bryan was scheduled to perform a second night at the venue the following evening.

  • Zach Bryan and band members wore “Free Palestine” shirts at Gillette Stadium.
  • The venue is owned by Robert Kraft’s company.
  • Kraft was involved in Macklemore’s removal from Ed Sheeran’s US tour.

New here? Start with this

Robert Kraft, who owns Gillette Stadium through his Kraft Group, removed rapper Macklemore from Ed Sheeran's touring schedule in September after Macklemore made pro-Palestinian remarks during a performance. Kraft said he felt obliged to address what he viewed as antisemitism, though he acknowledged that Palestinian suffering is real. Several other artists subsequently left the tour in solidarity with Macklemore.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has become an increasingly polarised issue in entertainment and sports, with artists' political statements drawing intense scrutiny. When public figures make statements about the conflict, they often face opposing pressure: some view pro-Palestinian speech as antisemitic, whilst others defend it as legitimate political expression. These tensions between free speech and institutional responsibility have played out repeatedly in the entertainment industry.

Macklemore responded to his removal by pledging $1 million to Palestinian aid organisations and announcing a separate Free Palestine Tour. The controversy reflects ongoing disagreements within the music world about political expression at performances and how institutions should respond.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Kraft's supporters would argue that stadium owners have the right to control their platforms and brand image. They contend that whilst Palestinian suffering deserves acknowledgement, pro-Palestinian rhetoric can blur into antisemitic tropes, and Kraft acted responsibly in protecting his venue from messaging he felt could promote bigotry. His position respects both free speech (Macklemore remains free to express himself) and property rights (owners determine what happens in their spaces).

The case against

Critics argue that legitimate political speech about Palestinian rights should not be equated with antisemitism, and that using economic leverage to suppress such speech represents corporate censorship. They contend that Kraft conflated criticism of Israeli policy with hatred of Jewish people, a conflation they believe dangerously weakens the meaning of antisemitism and silences important humanitarian concerns through claims of bigotry rather than genuine debate about the merits.

More coverage

Entertainment Music

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by Billboard as “Zach Bryan Wears ‘Free Palestine’ Shirt at Robert Kraft’s Gillette Stadium”.