Apple won’t turn on any ‘restricted mode’ for missed lease payments

The Verge ·

Apple has confirmed it will not restrict the functionality of devices leased through its new Upgrade programme if customers miss payments, following concerns raised by a report on hidden code found in an iOS 27 beta. Apple spokesperson Brian Bumbery told The Verge that "there will be no restricted mode and/or there will be no limitations put on device functionality due to missed payments or default" under the scheme, directly addressing fears that leased devices could be remotely crippled.

The concern stemmed from 9to5Mac's discovery of code for an "App Managed Features" system, which reportedly would let financial partners perform ongoing status checks on a device and allow Apple's system services to trigger a "Restricted Mode" for customers not in good financial standing, locking out most apps except basics like Phone, the App Store, Clock, Settings and Wallet. The Upgrade programme itself, launched in partnership with buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna, lets customers lease a new iPhone, iPad, Mac or Apple Watch for a flat monthly fee with no interest; Klarna says missing three consecutive payments will instead lead to lease termination and a demand for the full outstanding balance, rather than any device lockout.

In short

  • Apple denies it will remotely restrict leased devices over missed payments.
  • Fears arose from iOS 27 beta code enabling a "Restricted Mode".
  • Klarna says missed payments instead end the lease and demand full payment.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Financing programmes depend on creditors managing financial risk effectively. Remote functionality restrictions offer a measured approach that is less disruptive than immediate repossession or legal proceedings, whilst preserving access to emergency functions like calling and payments. Such tools could help make lease programmes more financially sustainable by creating clear incentives for borrowers to maintain payment compliance.

The case against

Remotely restricting device functionality raises significant concerns about consumer autonomy and device security once products are in customers' hands. Alternative remedies—lease termination, standard debt collection—already provide creditors meaningful recourse without requiring the ability to remotely cripple consumer devices. Accepting such capabilities sets a concerning precedent for the level of vendor control companies can exert over personal technology.

Explained simply

Apple's Upgrade programme is a new scheme that lets customers lease iPhones, iPads, Macs and Apple Watches for a monthly fee rather than buying them outright. The service operates through Klarna, a financial company that specialises in flexible payment options. Customers pay a set amount each month with no interest, and can upgrade to newer models regularly.

Concerns about the scheme arose when technology publications discovered hidden code in an upcoming version of Apple's software that appeared designed to restrict device functionality if customers missed payments. The code suggested a "Restricted Mode" could lock most apps, leaving only essential functions such as making calls, checking the time, and accessing settings. This raised questions about whether Apple intended to remotely limit devices as a debt collection method.

This matters because it affects how tech companies might handle payment disputes with customers who lease or finance devices. As lease and payment plans become increasingly common ways for people to access expensive technology, the terms governing device functionality if payments are missed are significant for millions of users.

Software

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion