Thetford mob who stormed homes of migrants will face ‘full force of the law’, warns police chief

Daily Mail ·

Norfolk Police faced accusations of heavy-handed tactics after three consecutive nights of violent anti-migrant protests in Thetford, during which officers reportedly used Pava spray, similar to pepper spray, on crowds outside a property being targeted by demonstrators. Chief Constable Paul Sanford defended his officers' response, insisting they had acted appropriately given escalating disorder, and warned that anyone found to have broken the law would face "the full force of the law."

A local resident alleged that a woman in a wheelchair was among those affected by the spray after a mostly peaceful protest in Clover Way turned "rowdy" once extra officers arrived, with youths reportedly throwing eggs and stones at a house and a police car. Norfolk Police said it was not their intention to affect bystanders but that anyone remaining within an area of active disorder risked being caught up in police tactics. Sanford said two officers were hospitalised on Wednesday night and suggested that without police intervention, protesters could have forced entry into targeted properties, endangering both occupants and demonstrators. Home Office minister Anna Turley separately condemned the violence as "horrendous" and unacceptable.

In short

  • Norfolk Police defend use of force during Thetford anti-migrant riots
  • Woman in wheelchair reportedly hit by police pepper spray
  • Chief constable vows "full force of the law" against offenders

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Police appear to have used indiscriminate force against a gathering that was initially peaceful, affecting innocent bystanders including vulnerable people in wheelchairs. Whilst some youths may have thrown projectiles, this alone does not justify Pava spray against areas where many were protesting peacefully, and such heavy-handed tactics risk undermining the legitimate right to protest and eroding public trust in police proportionality.

The case against

Police faced an escalating and sustained situation—officers were hospitalised and crowds were clearly attempting to force entry into targeted properties, which posed genuine danger to residents and demonstrators alike. Once disorder reaches such severity, police have a duty to act decisively, and the presence of projectiles being thrown justified crowd control measures to prevent further violence and property destruction. The force used was proportionate given these circumstances and likely prevented worse outcomes.

Explained simply

Thetford is a town in Norfolk, in eastern England. Anti-migrant protests there have focused on homes where migrants are believed to live, raising concerns about the safety of residents and the right to protest.

Norfolk Police is responsible for responding to disorder in the town, and its chief constable is Paul Sanford. Police use Pava spray to control some violent situations; it is similar to pepper spray. The Home Office, which oversees policing and immigration policy in England, is represented in this story by minister Anna Turley.

The issue matters because police must manage public disorder while protecting protesters, local residents and people inside targeted homes. The police response, and how it affects bystanders, can also prompt questions about the use of force and accountability.

Geopolitics Politics World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion