Meta has some Wonder Full new AI models
Meta has launched two new artificial intelligence models, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, which are available to Muse Code subscribers from today. The launch represents Meta's bid to reclaim ground in the intensifying AI competition against established leaders, following significant investments in talent and infrastructure.
Meta claims the models match the performance of industry rivals including OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1, based on internal testing across industry benchmarks. The company plans to eventually power its Muse AI agent with Wonder, beginning with subscribers, and intends to develop specialised models for wider distribution, though no specific timeline has been given.
- Meta launches Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full to rival OpenAI and Anthropic models.
- New AI models available to Muse Code subscribers starting today.
- Part of Meta's broader push to become a major AI force.
New here? Start with this
Meta is one of the world's largest technology companies, best known for operating social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram. In recent years, the company has expanded into developing artificial intelligence systems, joining competitors like OpenAI and Anthropic in a race to create increasingly advanced AI models. These AI systems can now perform complex tasks such as answering questions, generating text and analysing data.
Tech companies see artificial intelligence as a transformative technology that will shape the future of computing and create new business opportunities. Success in AI development offers companies competitive advantages, from powering internal products to selling AI services to other businesses and consumers. The competition has accelerated significantly, with companies regularly announcing new capabilities and seeking to demonstrate their leadership in this field.
The outcome of this AI competition will likely determine which companies exercise the most influence over how artificial intelligence develops and is deployed across society. The leaders in AI development will shape what tools become available to businesses and consumers, making their success consequential beyond the technology industry itself. Understanding this competitive landscape helps explain why announcements from tech giants about AI capabilities generate significant attention.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Meta's entry into competitive AI development benefits the market through genuine competition. A three-way race among Meta, OpenAI and Anthropic drives innovation faster than any single leader could, and Meta's substantial infrastructure investments will likely accelerate progress and eventually bring advanced capabilities to more users. Competition creates redundancy, choice and prevents monopolistic control over a critical technology.
The case against
Concentrating powerful AI development in the hands of a few large technology companies, particularly Meta given its documented track record on privacy and data stewardship, is concerning. Meta's history of misusing user information raises legitimate questions about safeguards. The lack of meaningful timelines for public access and reliance on Meta's own benchmark claims rather than independent verification suggest this represents further consolidation of AI power among corporations rather than genuine democratisation.