Vance takes aim at soft-on-crime Dems as GOP faces uphill midterm battle: ‘Lost their minds’
Vice-President JD Vance argued that electing Democrats would make communities less safe, using reports of Somali gang violence in Minnesota to attack their approach to crime. His comments came as Republicans face a difficult midterm campaign, with voters concerned about the cost of living and the war in Iran.
Speaking after a Texas rally for Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton, Vance criticised Democratic candidate James Talarico for taking two weeks off campaigning, while leaving the question of a debate between them to the candidates. A September poll found 61% of respondents saw petrol prices as a major problem, 52% healthcare costs, 54% housing costs and 62% grocery prices; the national average petrol price had risen from $2.98 to $4.33 a gallon since the Iran war began.
- Vance attacked Democrats over crime and community safety.
- Republicans face voter concerns over prices and Iran.
- He campaigned for Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton.
New here? Start with this
The US midterm elections take place halfway through a president’s four-year term. Voters choose members of Congress, including senators and representatives, and the results can affect which party controls Congress and how easily the president can pass laws.
JD Vance is the Republican vice-president, while Ken Paxton is the party’s candidate for a Texas Senate seat and James Talarico is a Democratic candidate in Texas. Republicans and Democrats differ on issues including crime and public safety, and claims about gang violence have become part of the political argument over which party would keep communities safe.
The campaign is also taking place amid concerns about everyday costs and the war in Iran. These issues matter because voters’ views on prices, healthcare, housing and foreign policy can shape support for candidates and parties.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Vance’s argument is that voters should treat public safety as a central test of political leadership, and that Democratic policies or priorities may leave communities less able to prevent and respond to crime. Reports of gang violence in Minnesota could reinforce concerns among residents who want candidates to explain how they would protect people and hold offenders accountable.
The case against
Critics could argue that invoking Somali gang violence to condemn Democrats risks generalising from specific reports and using fear to score political points, without showing that the candidates’ policies would cause more crime. They may also contend that voters should weigh the full record on public safety alongside pressing concerns such as living costs and healthcare, rather than accept a broad claim that electing Democrats would make communities less safe.