‘Street Fighter’ Isn’t the K.O. Reboot Fans Hoped For | Review
The new live-action *Street Fighter* film is an ambitious attempt to adapt the popular video game series, but the review says it falls short of the reboot fans may have hoped for. Its story is described as confusing and poorly paced, with tournament fights sometimes happening off-screen, even though action is the film’s strongest feature.
Set in a neon-soaked version of the 1990s, the film reunites former companions Ken and Ryu for a tournament organised by Lord M. Bison. Andrew Koji is praised as Ryu, while Guile and Blanka are singled out as entertaining; Ken and Chun-Li are less successful, and other supporting characters make little impression. The review suggests the film may appeal to fans of the 1994 adaptation, but is less likely to satisfy viewers seeking a strong story or a faithful take on the games.
- The film’s story and editing are criticised as messy.
- Its action is a strength, though some fights happen off-screen.
- Ryu, Guile and Blanka stand out among a mixed cast.
New here? Start with this
Street Fighter began as a series of video games in which martial artists from different countries compete in fights. Ryu and Ken are long-time rivals and companions, while Chun-Li, Guile and the villain M. Bison are among its best-known characters. The games are recognised for their distinctive fighters and action.
The series has been adapted for film before, including a 1994 live-action version. A new film set in a stylised 1990s brings several familiar characters together around a tournament organised by Bison. For viewers, the appeal may depend on whether they are looking for game-inspired fights and familiar characters or a clear story and close ties to the games.