UMG’s MCA Label Trims Staff as Part of Broader Corporate Restructuring
Universal Music Group’s Nashville label MCA has laid off around 14 staff as part of the company’s wider cost-cutting and restructuring plan. The cuts, focused on promotion, are part of changes affecting executives in the United States and internationally.
Those reported to be leaving MCA include COO Rob Femia, promotion and regional marketing senior vice-president Miranda McDonald, and four regional promotion directors. UMG said the plan is intended to improve efficiency and respond to changes in the music industry, while continuing investment in artists and songwriters. Announced in 2024, it aims to save €250 million a year by the end of 2026.
- MCA has laid off around 14 staff.
- The cuts focus on its promotional team.
- UMG aims to save €250 million annually by 2026.
New here? Start with this
MCA is a Nashville-based country music label owned by Universal Music Group, one of the world’s largest music companies. Labels sign and develop artists, release their recordings and promote their music to audiences and radio stations.
Universal Music Group’s restructuring is a company-wide effort to reduce costs and change how parts of the business operate. The company has said it aims to save €250 million a year by the end of 2026, while continuing to invest in artists and songwriters.
The changes matter to people working at MCA and may affect how the label promotes its artists. They are also part of wider shifts in the music industry, where companies are adapting their operations as listening habits and ways of reaching audiences change.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
UMG can argue that restructuring is a prudent response to shifts in how music is marketed and consumed, and that reducing overlapping or less effective roles can help it stay competitive. Reaching its savings target may preserve resources for investment in artists and songwriters, while a leaner organisation could make decisions more efficiently.
The case against
Staff and those concerned about the label’s future can argue that cutting promotion roles risks weakening the relationships and local knowledge that help artists reach audiences. Even if savings improve short-term efficiency, losing experienced staff may disrupt campaigns and reduce support for artists and songwriters, particularly if cost targets take priority over long-term creative development.