Business news and discussion on TalkFuse.
London Post highlights how fake local news sites may promote Kremlin interests
The London Post presents itself as a local news site, publishing everyday community stories alongside flattering profiles of figures such as “Sir Patrick Bijou”. The article says Bijou is the assumed name of Eric Danison, a fraudster jailed over a £14 million property scam, and alleges the site is part of a wider “pink slime” network used to promote Kremlin interests. The concern is that sites designed to look like ordinary local news can quietly shape political debate and undermine trust in news.
The London Post has published more than 25,000 stories since 2017, but none carries an individual journalist’s byline; its articles are attributed to “LDN-Post”. The article also points to a disconnected tipline and unrelated or questionable features, including a list of Ukrainian dating websites and profiles of people whose businesses had been struck off. It describes “pink slime” as a term for low-quality news content mixed with political propaganda, and says the network also featured far-Right activist Tommy Robinson.
In short
- The London Post published over 25,000 stories without individual bylines.
- The article alleges it is part of a Kremlin-linked “pink slime” network.
- Ordinary local stories may help disguise political messaging.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Sites that imitate local journalism can make political messaging appear to be ordinary community reporting, giving readers little chance to judge who produced it or whose interests it serves. The reported lack of bylines and disconnected tipline may deepen concerns about accountability and the erosion of trust in local news.
The case against
A site’s unusual presentation, questionable profiles or lack of bylines do not, by themselves, establish that it is controlled by or deliberately advancing Kremlin interests. The allegations should be assessed against verifiable evidence, while recognising that loosely edited or unconventional outlets can publish material without being part of a coordinated propaganda effort.
Explained simply
Local news sites report on everyday issues in a particular area, such as community events and local businesses. Some sites use the appearance of local journalism while publishing large volumes of material with no named reporters; this kind of operation is sometimes called “pink slime”.
The term describes low-quality news content that can be mixed with political messaging. Researchers and journalists examine who runs these sites, what they publish and whether their work is connected to political interests, including those of other countries.
The issue matters because readers may mistake such sites for independent local reporting. That can affect how political stories are understood and make it harder to know which news sources are trustworthy.
Business Economy Europe UK World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Daily Mail as “How Russia’s pink slime is poisoning online news: That’s the name given to the growing number of local sites which pump out a sinister mix of apparently harmless stories alongside hatchet jobs and propaganda for the Kremlin”.