High-flyer, 32, worked her way out of poverty to start new life in America… only to die in freak scooter accident
A 32-year-old South Korean woman who had moved to San Francisco 18 months ago to pursue her career was killed after her electric scooter's wheel became lodged in tram tracks on Market Street, causing her to fall into the path of a delivery truck. Yebin Kim, who had worked her way up from a working-class family to a place at the prestigious Seoul National University before joining renewable energy firm QCells, died from a head injury despite wearing a helmet, prompting fresh calls from campaigners for safety improvements on the notoriously hazardous street.
Kim was struck on 7 August while travelling eastbound along the three-mile stretch of track that runs the length of Market Street; she was due to fly home to visit her family less than a month later. Her death was recorded as San Francisco's 17th traffic fatality of 2026 and the first involving a scooter rider, according to the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, which held a vigil demanding physical barriers to separate cyclists and scooter users from trucks and buses. Campaigners noted that banning private vehicles from Market Street in 2020 had cut injury collisions by 40%, but that Mayor Daniel Lurie's decision last August to readmit Uber, Lyft and Waymo vehicles had reversed some of that progress.
- South Korean professional, 32, died after scooter got stuck in SF tram tracks
- Struck by delivery truck; suffered fatal head injury despite wearing helmet
- Death was San Francisco's 17th traffic fatality of 2026, prompting safety vigil
New here? Start with this
Yebin Kim was a South Korean professional who moved to San Francisco to pursue her career in renewable energy. Her background included studying at Seoul National University and working for QCells, a solar energy company.
Market Street is a major San Francisco thoroughfare with tram tracks running along it, as well as routes used by buses, cyclists and scooter riders. Scooter wheels can catch in the tracks, and campaigners have called for physical barriers to provide more separation from larger vehicles.
San Francisco restricted private cars on much of Market Street in 2020, a change associated with fewer injury collisions. The city later allowed some ride-hailing and autonomous vehicles back, renewing debate about how to balance access to the street with safety.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Restricting private cars and physically separating scooters and bicycles from heavy vehicles could reduce the risk of severe collisions on Market Street, where tram tracks pose an additional hazard. Supporters argue that the reported fall in injury collisions after the 2020 vehicle ban shows that street design and access rules can improve safety, and that preventing further deaths should take priority.
The case against
Keeping some private vehicles on Market Street can support access for residents, businesses and passengers who cannot easily use other transport, including ride-hailing services. Opponents of a broad ban could argue that the reported collision reduction does not by itself show that the later return of those vehicles caused injuries to rise, and that targeted track-side protections and safer vehicle operation may address risks with fewer restrictions.