L.A. Film School Escapes Whistleblower Lawsuit as Judge Punishes Lawyer for AI Use

Variety ·

A federal judge dismissed a whistleblower lawsuit accusing the Los Angeles Film School of inflating graduate job placement figures to preserve accreditation and access to federal student loans. The ruling ends the case and also draws attention to an attorney’s use of an AI-generated court brief containing faulty legal citations.

The suit, filed in 2024 by former executives Dave Phillips and Ben Chaib, alleged that the school paid outside vendors to hire students for short jobs and misled Department of Education investigators. The school had paid $1 million to resolve an audit in 2020; the judge found much of the alleged conduct was beyond the six-year limitation period and dismissed the case with prejudice. He fined attorney Mark Kleiman $5,000 after his 76-page brief cited a non-existent case and misused two real cases; the judge did not sanction the former executives.

In short

  • Judge dismisses the fraud lawsuit against the Los Angeles Film School.
  • The school paid $1 million to resolve a 2020 education audit.
  • The claimants’ lawyer was fined $5,000 over an AI-assisted brief.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

The former executives’ allegations, if supported, describe conduct that could mislead regulators and students about graduates’ job prospects, while helping a school retain accreditation and access to federal loans. The earlier $1 million audit resolution may also make scrutiny of the claims a matter of public accountability, even though it does not prove the lawsuit’s allegations.

The case against

The school can reasonably argue that a court must decide claims on admissible evidence and within statutory time limits, not on allegations alone. The judge found much of the alleged conduct fell outside the six-year limitation period and dismissed the case with prejudice; the lawyer’s faulty citations also give reason to question the quality of the filing, though the judge did not sanction the former executives.

Explained simply

US colleges that receive federal student loan money must meet government rules and, in some cases, maintain accreditation, a status showing they meet recognised education standards. Schools also report how many graduates find work, figures that can affect how their performance is assessed.

Former Los Angeles Film School executives Dave Phillips and Ben Chaib brought the case under a law that allows people with knowledge of alleged fraud against the government to sue on its behalf. The school had previously paid $1 million to settle an audit, but that settlement did not itself decide the later allegations.

The case also concerns the duties of lawyers when using artificial intelligence to prepare court papers. AI tools can produce convincing text while getting legal sources wrong, so lawyers remain responsible for checking that citations and arguments are accurate.

AI Entertainment Film Geopolitics Politics Technology

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion