Prosecutors begin presenting evidence in Russell Brand’s rape trial
Developing story first seen 2 hours ago
The prosecution has begun presenting its case against Russell Brand at Southwark Crown Court, where jurors heard the allegations and the prosecution’s account of his behaviour. Brand denies wrongdoing and has pleaded not guilty; the trial is expected to continue into December.
The seven charges relate to allegations by six women about incidents between 1999 and 2009: three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault. Prosecutors say the women did not know one another and came forward after a 2023 documentary or media reports; Brand told police he did not recall meeting them and said any sexual contact was consensual. The jury has eight men and four women, and was warned not to research Brand.
- Prosecutors have begun outlining allegations against Russell Brand.
- He denies all seven charges and says any sexual contact was consensual.
- The trial is expected to continue into December.
New here? Start with this
Russell Brand is a British actor, comedian and presenter who became known for stand-up, television and films including Forgetting Sarah Marshall. The case concerns allegations made by six women about incidents said to have taken place between 1999 and 2009.
The charges include rape, sexual assault and indecent assault. Brand denies the allegations and has pleaded not guilty. A jury will hear the evidence and decide whether the charges are proved.
The case matters because it brings serious allegations against a high-profile figure before a criminal court. The jury’s role is to consider the evidence presented in court, without outside research or discussion.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The prosecution’s case is that the allegations by six women, concerning serious offences over a ten-year period, should be tested together before a jury. A trial allows the complainants’ accounts and other evidence to be examined under oath, with the jury deciding whether the charges are proved.
The case against
Brand has pleaded not guilty and denies wrongdoing, so the allegations remain to be proved in court. A fair trial requires the jury to assess each charge on the evidence, without treating the number of allegations or the publicity around the case as proof of guilt.
Full account
Prosecutors began presenting their case against Russell Brand at Southwark Crown Court in London on Wednesday. The comedian and actor has pleaded not guilty to seven charges: three of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault. The allegations concern six women and relate to events between 1999 and 2009. Brand has denied wrongdoing.
Opening the prosecution case, Riel Karmy-Jones KC described Brand as someone whose appetite for sexual contact was, she said, “indiscriminate and voracious”. She alleged that he could be charming when it suited him, but also demanding and entitled, and argued that he pursued women without regard for their identities or how they felt afterwards. The prosecution also outlined an allegation that Brand raped one woman anally. These are accusations put to the jury; they have not been established in court.
Karmy-Jones said the six women did not know one another and had not met before, and that they came forward after watching the 2023 Channel 4 documentary Russell Brand: In Plain Sight. The jury of eight men and four women was sworn in on Tuesday. Judge Mr Justice Bennathan had excluded prospective jurors who had watched the documentary or read reporting on the allegations, as well as some who had worked for media organisations connected to Brand’s career. He instructed jurors not to research Brand or the case, warning that doing so could prejudice the trial and constitute a criminal offence.
Brand attended court in a dark pinstripe suit and white tie, accompanied on Wednesday by his wife, Laura. The trial is expected to last around ten weeks, extending into December. Brand became known in Britain through television and radio before acting in films including Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Get Him to the Greek. The reports also note his later public reinvention as a Christian convert and commentator on free speech.
Where outlets differ
The first report focuses on the prosecution’s opening allegations, the charges and jury instructions. The second centres on Laura Brand’s support for her husband, drawing on comments from an associate and describing her expected attendance and family circumstances; it offers little detail about the prosecution’s evidence. Its account says she attended the jury swearing-in on Monday, while the first says Brand was accompanied by her on Wednesday. The first describes the trial as stretching into December; the second characterises it as an estimated ten-week trial. These details concern different aspects of the proceedings and are not necessarily inconsistent.
More coverage
- Daily Mail — 'She's absolutely besotted with him and always has been': Why Russell Brand's wife Laura is standing by him during his rape trial as insiders tell KATIE HIND how she 'tamed' him, what her family think and meeting when she was 19
- Variety — Russell Brand Was ‘Ruthless and Calculated’ With a ‘Voracious’ Desire for ‘Sexual Contact,’ Prosecution Alleges in Rape Trial Opening Statement
Business Markets Space Technology
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Deadline as “Russell Brand Rape Trial: Prosecution Opens Case Against ‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall’ Star”.