Russia cancels Kanye West: St Petersburg stadium abruptly scraps plans for performance by shamed rapper – as politician condemns star’s ‘disgusting antics’

← Back to the feed

Russia cancels Kanye West: St Petersburg stadium abruptly scraps plans for performance by shamed rapper – as politician condemns star’s ‘disgusting antics’

Developing story first seen 2 hours ago

Daily Mail · 2 hours ago

Confusion has broken out over Kanye West's planned Russian concerts after Gazprom Arena in St Petersburg announced on Instagram that it was not the organiser of the show and had never signed a rental contract, effectively cancelling the sold-out dates. Moscow promoter Say Agency immediately disputed this, insisting the concert had not been called off and that preparations were continuing, while saying it only learned of the venue's announcement from media reports and was seeking clarification. The mixed messages leave in doubt whether the rapper, now known as Ye, will still become the first major Western performer to play in Russia since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The shows had been scheduled for 10 and 11 October and would mark a significant step in Ye's attempted image rehabilitation following widely condemned antisemitic remarks, including a song titled "Heil Hitler" and swastika-branded merchandise, for which he apologised in January, citing bipolar disorder. Say Agency, which had posted in his defence just two days earlier urging fans to look beyond "a single soundbite", has asked the public to await official confirmation rather than react to rumours. Conservative Russian lawmaker Vitaly Milonov welcomed the apparent cancellation, branding Ye's behaviour "disgusting antics" and suggesting he perform traditional Russian songs instead.

  • Gazprom Arena says it never signed a contract for Ye's Russian shows
  • Promoter Say Agency denies cancellation, says concert plans continue
  • Shows would have been Ye's first major Western act in Russia since 2022

New here? Start with this

Confusion has surrounded Kanye West's planned concerts in Russia, following his self-adopted name Ye. He had been booked to play two shows in St Petersburg in October, organised by a Moscow-based promoter, which would have made him the first major Western star to perform in Russia since the country's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The dates were also being seen as part of Ye's attempt to rebuild his public image after widely condemned antisemitic comments and merchandise, for which he later apologised, citing bipolar disorder. His planned appearance had already drawn criticism from at least one Russian politician, reflecting wider unease in some quarters about the booking.

Uncertainty then emerged over whether the shows were still going ahead, after the venue and the promoter gave conflicting accounts of the concert's status.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Those sympathetic to the concert proceeding argue that people who cause serious offence should be given a genuine chance to make amends, particularly when they have apologised and cited a diagnosed mental health condition as a contributing factor. On this view, promoters and venues are entitled to make commercial decisions on artistic merit rather than bowing to political pressure, and permanently barring a performer from ever working again risks conflating accountability with indefinite punishment. Fans and industry figures who bought tickets or built plans around the show also have a reasonable interest in seeing it honoured rather than cancelled at the last minute over shifting official explanations.

The case against

Those opposed to the concert proceeding argue that hosting a performer who released a song titled 'Heil Hitler' and sold swastika-branded merchandise sends a troubling message, regardless of any apology, and that venues and officials are right to withdraw support rather than appear to endorse or profit from such conduct. They contend that an apology attributing the behaviour to illness does not erase the real harm caused to Jewish communities and others, and that public figures with large platforms bear a heightened responsibility not to normalise hateful imagery. On this view, declining to provide a stage is a legitimate exercise of an organisation's own values and reputation, not censorship of the individual's right to express himself elsewhere.

More coverage

Celebrity Entertainment Europe Music World

Read the full article at the source →