David Sullivan attends West Ham’s Portsmouth cup match despite advice
Developed over time first seen 2 months ago
Former West Ham co-chairman David Sullivan attended the club's Carabao Cup match against Portsmouth at London Stadium, despite the venue having recommended he stay away from home fixtures amid concerns about possible supporter unrest. It was West Ham's first game since allegations against Sullivan came to light, though no trouble was reported in or around the ground before or shortly after kick-off, and the club won 3-1.
Sullivan resigned as co-chair in June after seven women accused him of sexually exploitative and predatory behaviour, allegations he categorically denies, though he remains West Ham's largest individual shareholder with a 38.8% stake. A joint investigation by BBC Panorama and The Times had found he was barred from contact with the club's women's and youth teams for the previous three years over safeguarding concerns; the fixture also marked West Ham's first appearance in the EFL Cup's opening round in 15 years, following relegation from the Premier League.
- Sullivan attended West Ham v Portsmouth despite stadium's advice to stay away
- No unrest reported; West Ham won the match 3-1
- He quit as co-chair in June over misconduct allegations he denies
New here? Start with this
David Sullivan is West Ham United’s largest individual shareholder, holding a 38.8% stake in the club. He resigned as co-chairman in June after seven women accused him of sexually exploitative and predatory behaviour; he categorically denies the allegations.
West Ham play at the London Stadium and have men’s, women’s and youth teams. Safeguarding concerns had led to Sullivan being barred from contact with the women’s and youth teams for three years, while the club’s relegation meant it was returning to the early rounds of the EFL Cup for the first time in 15 years.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Sullivan has a fundamental right to attend matches as West Ham's largest individual shareholder and categorically denies the allegations against him. Absent legal charges or conviction, excluding him from the stadium based on unproven claims would represent a form of presumed guilt contrary to basic fairness principles. No trouble occurred at the match, which suggests his judgment was sound, and accepting that he should self-exile would implicitly concede guilt he does not accept.
The case against
The club explicitly advised Sullivan to stay away from home fixtures, reflecting genuine concerns about managing supporter sentiment and safeguarding risks. The institution's prior three-year bar on his contact with women's and youth teams signalled serious safeguarding concerns that remained unresolved. Attending despite this advice, whatever his shareholder rights, showed insufficient deference to the club's duty of care toward its community and accusers who deserve to see the institution take their concerns seriously during the investigative period.
More coverage
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by BBC Sport as “Sullivan attends West Ham game despite advice not to”.