Transgender Green activist elected female rep on party’s governing board is self-described Communist and claimed Labour is far more ‘evil’ than regime in Tehran
A transgender activist has been elected as a female representative on the Green Party's governing board, a move highlighted by the Daily Mail alongside claims that the individual is a self-described Communist. The activist reportedly claimed that the Labour Party is far more "evil" than the regime in Tehran, a comparison likely to prove controversial and draw scrutiny to the Green Party's internal elections and candidate vetting.
Beyond the headline claims, the article text supplied does not provide further verified detail on the individual's identity, the specific board position, when the election took place, or the full context of the remarks attributed to them. The piece appears alongside unrelated Daily Mail content, and no additional named sources, quotes or timeline were available to corroborate the claims in full.
- Transgender activist elected to female rep role on Green Party's board
- Activist reportedly describes themselves as a Communist
- They allegedly called Labour "more evil" than Tehran's regime
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters of Ms Folan's right to make this comparison argue it reflects a consistent anti-imperialist position: they point to the human cost of British foreign policy under Labour governments, including the Iraq War, arms sales fuelling the war in Yemen, and sanctions regimes, arguing these have caused deaths on a scale that is rarely subjected to the same moral scrutiny as actions by designated adversary states. From this view, holding one's own government to at least as high a standard as regimes it criticises is a matter of intellectual consistency rather than provocation, and shutting down such comparisons risks shielding British institutions from legitimate accountability.
The case against
Critics argue the comparison is a false equivalence that trivialises the systematic, state-directed repression carried out by the Tehran regime, including executions of dissidents, the persecution of women and LGBT people, and the suppression of basic freedoms, none of which are comparable to the failures of a democratic party operating under the rule of law and subject to elections and a free press. They contend that such rhetoric, especially from someone elected to represent women on a party's governing board, undermines trust in her judgement and risks alienating those who see the remark as minimising the suffering of people living under authoritarian rule.