← Back to the feed

Trump Aides Admit the House is a Lost Cause

Wired ·

Republican officials increasingly believe the party is unlikely to hold the House in the coming midterm elections, and the White House has shifted towards defending its Senate majority. The change reflects a worsening political outlook for Republicans, with key House races no longer seen as winnable and voters focused on high living and fuel costs.

The Congressional Leadership Fund has withdrawn or cancelled advertising in targeted districts in Michigan, Ohio, Nebraska, New Jersey and Iowa. The Senate contest is also difficult, but aides see a possible path to retaining control through races in Alaska, Iowa and Ohio; Republican spending in North Carolina has been paused. With 20 days until the election, Donald Trump is campaigning to mobilise his supporters, while Republicans say they remain committed to protecting their majorities.

  • Republican aides see the House as likely lost.
  • The White House is prioritising the Senate.
  • Trump is campaigning to mobilise his base.

New here? Start with this

The US Congress has two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. All House seats are contested every two years, while only about a third of Senate seats are up each election; control of either chamber affects which laws can pass and how the president’s agenda is scrutinised.

Republicans currently hold majorities in both chambers, and Donald Trump is president. The Congressional Leadership Fund is a Republican group that raises money for campaigns and buys adverts in competitive House districts. Voters’ views on the cost of living and fuel can influence these races, alongside their views of the president and his party.

If Democrats win the House, they would lead its committees and could block or investigate parts of the Republican agenda, even if Republicans kept the Senate. Senate control matters for passing legislation and confirming presidential appointments, so the parties are competing to win close races in both chambers.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Republicans may be right to redirect limited campaign resources towards the Senate if their internal assessments show that several House races are no longer realistically competitive. Retaining the Senate could preserve an important check on a possible shift in congressional power, while Trump’s campaigning may still improve turnout and keep some close races in play.

The case against

Scaling back House advertising could make a difficult outlook worse by weakening support for Republican candidates before voters have decided, and it may signal that party leaders are giving up on districts they should still contest. Concentrating on the Senate also risks overlooking the House’s distinct importance, including its role in legislation and oversight, and could leave voters with less effective representation in closely fought races.

Elections Government Politics

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.