Trump secures record-breaking oil deal with Venezuela to double US reserves and slash gas prices

← Back to the feed

Trump secures record-breaking oil deal with Venezuela to double US reserves and slash gas prices

Developing story first seen 3 hours ago

Daily Mail · 3 hours ago

Donald Trump has now claimed the Venezuela agreement will give the United States control of more than 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, presenting it as the largest oil deal in history and saying it will cut petrol prices. The article says the deal is the second agreement with Venezuela’s interim government since Nicolás Maduro’s removal earlier this year, but its precise terms and the claimed transfer of control are not independently verified.

Trump said the arrangement involved interim president Delcy Rodríguez, US officials and private businesses, reportedly including American oil firms, with no cost to US taxpayers. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said it could bring nearly $100 billion of private investment and thousands of jobs to Venezuela; Venezuela holds an estimated 303 billion barrels of crude but produces about 1% of global oil because of deteriorated infrastructure.

  • Trump claims US access to 65 billion Venezuelan oil barrels.
  • Deal details remain unverified in the article.
  • Venezuela’s infrastructure limits current oil production.

New here? Start with this

Venezuela has some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but much of its crude is heavy and costly to extract and refine. Its oil industry has declined sharply over recent decades because of underinvestment, poor infrastructure, sanctions and political instability.

Nicolás Maduro led Venezuela for years amid disputed elections and international criticism of his government. Delcy Rodríguez has been a senior figure in that administration, while US policy towards Venezuela has often combined sanctions with limited licences for foreign oil companies.

Access to Venezuelan oil would not itself transfer ownership of those reserves to the United States; production depends on Venezuelan law, investment and operating agreements. More supply can affect petrol prices, but prices also depend on global oil markets, refining capacity, transport costs and demand.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters would argue that opening Venezuelan reserves to US investment could expand reliable supply, ease fuel costs and reduce vulnerability to disruptions elsewhere. They may also see private capital, jobs and oil-sector reconstruction as a practical route towards stabilising Venezuela’s economy and giving its interim authorities incentives to maintain constructive relations with the United States. In this view, commercially grounded engagement can serve both energy security and regional recovery.

The case against

Critics would argue that claims about doubling US reserves or sharply lowering petrol prices are premature without verified terms, production plans and evidence that Venezuelan infrastructure can deliver at the promised scale. They may warn that a deal negotiated after a change of government could lack durable legitimacy, expose investors to political and legal risk, and entrench dependence on fossil fuels. In this view, energy policy should prioritise transparent agreements, Venezuelan sovereignty and longer-term clean-energy resilience.

More coverage

Americas Government Politics World

Read the full article at the source →