Why Walliams’ unprecedented legal battle to stay anonymous failed
- Walliams lost his bid to block publication of an investigation.
- The judge said clinicians, not the court, were responsible for his safety.
- Walliams could seek redress through a defamation claim.
David Walliams failed in an unusual High Court bid to stop news organisations publishing an investigation into allegations against him. The case matters because the judge found no legal basis for a permanent injunction, and rejected the argument that allowing publication would make the court responsible for protecting…