Trump’s MAGA allies mock Harry and Meghan as report suggests President played a part in couple’s decision to leave US
Developed over time first seen 3 hours ago
Donald Trump's MAGA-aligned supporters have mocked the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after a report claimed the US President played a part in Harry and Meghan's decision to leave America. The mockery comes amid wider coverage of the couple's sudden move back to Britain, which reportedly took King Charles and Prince William by surprise.
Related reporting indicates Harry and Meghan are set to return to the UK this month, with children Archie and Lilibet expected to attend school there, though the couple do not plan to take on working royal duties. Other coverage notes that Charles was only informed of the move on the preceding Sunday, that questions remain over who will fund the family's security given Harry's unsuccessful legal battle over taxpayer-funded protection, and that the couple's business ventures in Hollywood and California are said to have struggled in recent years.
- Trump allies mock Harry and Meghan over reported role in US exit.
- Couple reportedly returning to UK this month, surprising Charles and William.
- Security funding and failed Hollywood deals remain unresolved questions.
New here? Start with this
Trump's MAGA allies have been mocking Harry and Meghan after a report suggested the US President played a role in the couple's decision to leave America. Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and moved to California, where they built a media and business career, though some ventures are said to have struggled recently.
The couple are now reportedly planning to move back to Britain this month with their children, Archie and Lilibet, without resuming official royal roles. The move is said to have come as a surprise to King Charles and Prince William, and questions remain about arrangements such as security funding, given Harry previously lost a legal case over receiving taxpayer-funded protection in the UK.
This story matters because it touches on the ongoing public interest in the Sussexes' relationship with the wider Royal Family, as well as the political dimension introduced by claims linking President Trump to their decision, a connection his supporters have seized on.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters of the mockery argue that Harry and Meghan chose to become vocal political actors, including public criticism of Donald Trump and an implicit intervention in the 2020 US election, and that entering the political arena means accepting robust, even mocking, scrutiny when their venture appears to falter. From this view, pointing out that a president they criticised may have contributed to their departure is fair comment on the consequences of their own choices, not an attack on private citizens, and holding public figures accountable for the gap between their stated principles and their circumstances is a legitimate part of open political debate.
The case against
Critics of the mockery argue that Harry and Meghan remain a family with two young children, and that gloating over a stressful relocation, unresolved security funding and reported business setbacks crosses from legitimate criticism into personal cruelty. From this perspective, treating a family's domestic and financial difficulties as a partisan punchline trivialises genuine welfare concerns, particularly around child safety, and reflects a wider coarsening of public discourse where any past criticism of a political figure is used to justify mockery of unrelated personal hardship.
More coverage