Dream, Valkyries stay off court for fourth WNBA Finals national anthem as some fans remain seated
The Atlanta Dream and Golden State Valkyries remained off court during the US national anthem before Game 4 of the WNBA Finals, continuing a practice seen throughout the series. Some spectators also stayed seated, as the teams’ absence drew criticism from political figures and renewed questions about what players do during the anthem.
Both teams have said staying off court is part of their pre-game routine. Atlanta coach Karl Smesko declined to explain the decision, while Golden State coach Natalie Nakase said she spends the anthem with staff focusing on plays. Atlanta’s Rhyne Howard said she is off court for the anthem during her time with the Dream but stands for it when representing the United States. Atlanta led the best-of-seven series 2–1 before Game 4.
In short
- Both teams stayed off court for the anthem for the fourth straight game.
- Some fans remained seated during the performance.
- Atlanta led the Finals series 2–1 before Game 4.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Players and teams may reasonably treat the anthem as a moment for personal reflection or preparation rather than a required public display, especially when their choice is part of an established pre-game routine. Staying off court does not by itself show disrespect, and players can hold different views about how best to honour the country while reserving the right to make their own choice.
The case against
Critics may see the anthem as a shared civic ritual that represents national unity and deserves visible respect from prominent athletes. Because the teams’ absence is conspicuous and has drawn public attention, they may feel players should explain their choice or take part on court, even if no formal rule requires it.