Flock CEO’s gunshot claims conflict with website’s wider audio alerts
Flock CEO Garrett Langley said the company’s microphones detect “just gunshots”, while Flock’s website describes audio alerts for other events, including fireworks, sideshows and car crashes. The gap between his remarks and the marketing claims has renewed scrutiny of the surveillance company’s audio collection and how its capabilities are presented.
Flock says its Gunshot Detection system listens across nearby neighbourhoods to help alert public safety agencies. The company previously tested detecting screaming, later changed its wording to “sounds of human distress” and says it removed distress detection after privacy concerns. A spokesperson said the system is not designed to monitor conversations or analyse speech, and does not currently detect screaming or distress.
- Flock’s CEO said its microphones detect only gunshots.
- The company’s website lists alerts for other sounds and events.
- Flock says it does not monitor conversations or detect distress.
New here? Start with this
Flock is a surveillance technology company that supplies cameras and audio systems to public safety agencies. Its Gunshot Detection system uses microphones placed in neighbourhoods to identify sounds and send alerts to agencies, which may use them to decide whether to respond.
The system has drawn attention because Flock has described its audio capabilities in different ways. The company says it does not monitor conversations or analyse speech, and that it no longer detects screaming or distress; its website has also advertised alerts for sounds such as fireworks, car crashes and sideshows.
The issue matters because audio surveillance can affect people who live or spend time near the equipment, including those who are not suspected of any crime. Clear information about what a system detects can help communities and public agencies assess its privacy implications.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Flock’s wider audio alerts could help public safety agencies respond to incidents such as crashes, fireworks or dangerous street gatherings, while its stated focus on event detection rather than speech analysis may limit privacy intrusion. The company says it removed distress detection after privacy concerns, which can be seen as evidence that its capabilities and safeguards have evolved in response to public scrutiny.
The case against
The contrast between the CEO’s claim that the microphones detect only gunshots and the website’s broader list of audio alerts raises reasonable questions about what the system can identify and how clearly those capabilities are disclosed. Even without analysing conversations, neighbourhood-wide audio collection and event detection beyond gunshots may affect privacy and merits transparent explanation and oversight.
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by TechCrunch as “Flock CEO says its microphones detect ‘just gunshots’ — its website says different”.