Iran sets conditions for reopening Hormuz as US deal stalls
Developing story first seen 2 hours ago
Iran has escalated its rhetoric over the strait of Hormuz, with its supreme national security council declaring the waterway will stay shut until the US "corrects its behaviour," while the UAE reported that an Iranian missile struck one of its Adnoc oil tankers on Saturday. The reopening of the strait, a critical corridor for global oil and gas exports, remains stalled despite Omani mediation, deepening uncertainty as the 60-day window for a final US-Iran deal nears its end.
Tehran's demands, set out by security council secretary Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, include a permanent end to the war, withdrawal of US forces from the region, lifting of the naval blockade and sanctions, full compensation for war damage, and unconditional release of frozen assets. Iran's foreign minister said negotiators were close to agreeing a transit route but stressed other conditions still stood in the way, blaming the impasse on US violations of June's interim agreement. Adnoc confirmed no casualties in Saturday's missile attack but said more than a dozen of its vessels have now been hit since the conflict began, underscoring the toll on shipping through the strait.
- Iran demands US end war, blockade and sanctions before reopening Hormuz
- UAE says Iranian missile hit an Adnoc tanker, no casualties
- Deal deadline looms in just over a week, may be extended
New here? Start with this
Iran and the United States have been locked in confrontation for weeks, with the strait of Hormuz at the centre of the dispute. This narrow waterway between Iran and Oman is one of the world's busiest shipping routes for oil and gas, so any threat to its use has knock-on effects for energy markets and global trade far beyond the region.
Tension escalated after military action between the two countries, and Iran has since linked the strait's reopening to a set of conditions it wants the US to meet, including a formal end to hostilities, the withdrawal of American forces from the region, and the lifting of sanctions and a naval blockade. Oman has been trying to broker a deal between Washington and Tehran, but talks have struggled to bridge the gap between what each side is willing to offer.
The UAE, a close US ally and major oil exporter, has also been drawn in, with its state oil company Adnoc reporting repeated attacks on its tankers during the standoff. The situation matters because a prolonged closure or disruption of the strait could unsettle oil supplies and shipping costs worldwide, while the stalled negotiations raise questions about whether the wider conflict can be resolved diplomatically.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters of Tehran's stance argue that after enduring military strikes, war damage and years of sanctions, Iran is entitled to demand verifiable guarantees rather than vague assurances before normalising a strategic waterway it also depends on economically. They contend that a durable peace requires enforceable terms – a genuine end to hostilities, withdrawal of foreign forces from the region, compensation for damage suffered, and access to its own frozen assets – and that holding firm on these points is a legitimate exercise of sovereignty rather than obstruction. From this view, blaming the impasse on alleged US violations of the June interim agreement reflects a reasonable insistence that commitments already made be honoured first.
The case against
Critics counter that the Strait of Hormuz is an international shipping corridor on which the global economy depends, and that using its closure, or attacks on tankers such as the UAE's Adnoc vessels, as leverage risks harming neutral third parties and ordinary consumers far beyond the parties to the conflict. They argue that linking a widening list of sweeping demands, including full compensation and unconditional asset release, to the reopening of a vital global artery amounts to coercive brinkmanship that punishes the wider world for a bilateral dispute. On this view, genuine diplomacy, as Omani mediation attempts to encourage, should proceed without holding international trade and shipping safety hostage to negotiating leverage.
More coverage
Americas Business Middle East World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “Iran issues tough demands to reopen strait of Hormuz as deal remains out of reach”.