Larry the Cable Guy takes aim at corporations that considered his Southern brand ‘too controversial’

Fox News ·

Larry the Cable Guy says corporations apply a double standard when deciding which entertainers are suitable for advertising. He believes DirecTV passed over him because his Southern accent and edgy humour were seen as too controversial, even as other performers with more provocative material secured major campaigns.

Speaking on “The MeatEater Podcast”, he said an advert featuring him switching to DirecTV could have been a hit. He cited Snoop Dogg’s advertising work as an example, while stressing he has nothing against the rapper and is upset with the companies making these choices. Larry, whose real name is Daniel Whitney, became widely known through the Blue Collar Comedy Tour with Jeff Foxworthy, Bill Engvall and Ron White.

In short

  • Larry says DirecTV may have considered his image too controversial.
  • He argues corporations apply inconsistent standards to entertainers.
  • He says he is not upset with Snoop Dogg.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Larry’s complaint is that advertisers may judge entertainers unevenly: his Southern persona and edgy humour might be treated as unacceptable while performers with other kinds of provocative material are welcomed. A campaign with him could have reached an audience that feels overlooked, and companies should apply clear, consistent standards rather than relying on assumptions about a performer’s image.

The case against

Advertisers have legitimate reasons to choose spokespeople whose style, audience and public image fit a particular campaign and brand. Different performers may carry different commercial associations, so a decision to use one entertainer and not another does not by itself establish a double standard; companies may also reasonably prefer a tone they consider more suitable for their customers.

Entertainment Health Medicine Music World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion