Israel rejects Board of Peace Gaza plan over disarmament terms
Developing story first seen 3 hours ago
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formally rejected a 15-point Gaza ceasefire proposal from the Board of Peace, dismissing it over what his government calls "fictitious disarmament" terms for Hamas. Announcing the decision at Sunday's Cabinet meeting, Netanyahu confirmed Israeli forces will not withdraw from the enclave until Hamas is genuinely and verifiably disarmed, hardening the position outlined in earlier reports of the rejection.
The specifics of the 15-point document have not been detailed, but Netanyahu's objection centres on the credibility of the disarmament mechanism it proposes, which Israel regards as inadequate to guarantee lasting security. The rejection reinforces the core deadlock in Gaza negotiations over sequencing: whether Hamas's weapons must be surrendered and confirmed before any Israeli withdrawal, or whether a withdrawal timeline can be agreed independently of that process.
- Netanyahu rejects Board of Peace's 15-point Gaza plan
- Cites "fictitious disarmament" terms for Hamas
- IDF won't withdraw until Hamas genuinely disarms
New here? Start with this
Israel's military campaign in Gaza began after Hamas, the militant group that has governed the territory since 2007, led an attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023 in which around 1,200 people were killed and hostages were taken. Since then, ceasefire and peace efforts have repeatedly stalled over how to end the fighting permanently, with disarming Hamas seen by Israel as a precondition for any lasting deal.
The Board of Peace is a body that has put forward a framework intended to bring the Gaza conflict to a close, covering issues such as governance of the territory after the war and how Hamas would give up its weapons. Its proposals sit alongside other international efforts, including those led by the United States, to broker an end to the fighting and set out what happens in Gaza afterwards.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, has led the country's wartime government and has consistently said Israeli troops will not leave Gaza until Hamas is fully disarmed. This dispute matters because it goes to the heart of why a lasting ceasefire has proved so hard to reach: negotiators disagree over whether Israel should withdraw its forces first and verify security afterwards, or whether disarmament and guarantees must come before any troop pullback.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Advocates of Israel's position argue that a ceasefire is only as good as its verification, and that Hamas has a documented record of exploiting ambiguous disarmament clauses to rearm and rebuild tunnel networks during past lulls in fighting. From this view, withdrawing troops before disarmament is confirmed would hand Hamas time and space to reconstitute its military capability, endangering both Israeli citizens and Gaza's population in any future conflict, so maintaining a military presence is framed as a necessary safeguard rather than an obstacle to peace.
The case against
Critics of Netanyahu's rejection argue that insisting on full disarmament as a precondition for withdrawal sets a bar that may never realistically be met, effectively making the occupation open-ended and prolonging humanitarian suffering in Gaza. They contend that credible international frameworks, phased verification, and monitoring mechanisms can offer adequate security guarantees without indefinite military occupation, and that rejecting a negotiated plan outright risks squandering a rare diplomatic opening and undermines trust in future negotiations.
More coverage
- The Hill — Netanyahu rejects plan to disarm Hamas in rare break with Trump
- Daily Mail — Trump's peace plan for Gaza is REJECTED by Israel as Netanyahu refuses to withdraw until Hamas is disarmed
Government Middle East Politics World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Fox News as “Netanyahu rejects Board of Peace’s Gaza plan: No ‘withdrawal until Hamas is genuinely disarmed’”.