← Back to the feed

Woman shot dead by NYPD after fatal Times Square stabbing

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

·

A woman was fatally shot by New York police officers in Times Square on Monday afternoon after she stabbed two bystanders, killing a Bank of America executive and seriously wounding a 68-year-old man. The suspect, Pamela Cisneros Lopez, 49, of Queens, refused to drop the two kitchen knives she was carrying and told officers "I would rather kill both of you" during a brief standoff before she was tasered and then shot as she ran at them. Police said Lopez had a documented history of mental health incidents in 2018 and 2019, though she had never been arrested, and officials found no clear motive for the attack.

Lopez pulled the knives from a shopping bag and first stabbed the 68-year-old man in the abdomen as he waited to cross the street with his wife; he remains in hospital in a stable condition. She then stabbed Erin Piacenti, 32, of Chester, New Jersey, in the abdomen, killing her; Piacenti was Bank of America's vice president of business selection and conflicts and had recently marked her second wedding anniversary. Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch praised the responding officers for preventing further casualties in the crowded tourist district, with witnesses describing scenes of panic and bloodshed as bystanders tried to help the victims.

  • Woman stabbed two people in Times Square, killing one
  • Police shot suspect Pamela Cisneros Lopez, 49, dead
  • Victim Erin Piacenti, 32, was a Bank of America executive

New here? Start with this

Woman shot dead by NYPD after fatal Times Square stabbing needs no repeat, so here's the primer.

Times Square is one of the busiest tourist areas in New York City, packed with visitors, shops and street performers at almost any hour. Because of this, any violent incident there tends to draw a large crowd of witnesses and be captured on video within moments, which is why accounts and footage of this event spread quickly.

The people involved were a woman carrying knives, who police say attacked two bystanders, and NYPD officers who were called to the scene. One of those attacked, a female tourist, later died from her injuries, while a male victim was left seriously hurt. Police say they used a taser before resorting to gunfire, after the woman is said to have run at them.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Advocates of the officers' actions argue that they faced a rapidly unfolding, lethal threat in a crowded public space: a woman had already stabbed two people, one fatally, and after being tasered still charged at armed officers with a large knife. In such split-second circumstances, with bystanders and tourists nearby, officers have a duty to stop an active threat before more people are killed or injured, and less-lethal options had already been tried and failed. Given the immediacy of the danger, this side holds that lethal force was a necessary and proportionate response to protect both the public and the officers themselves.

The case against

Critics who focus on policing of mental health crises argue that the case illustrates the risks of relying on armed officers, rather than trained crisis-intervention or mental health specialists, to respond to an evidently 'emotionally disturbed' individual. They contend that a person in acute psychological distress may not process commands or the threat of tasering rationally, and that repeated incidents of fatal police shootings of knife-wielding, apparently disturbed individuals in New York point to a systemic gap in de-escalation training, resources, and alternative response models. This side values developing approaches that could reduce the likelihood of such encounters ending in death, even while acknowledging the extreme danger officers faced in that moment.

Coverage

World

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.