Will the future of gaming be powered by upstart indie developers?
As major games publishers such as Electronic Arts, Microsoft and Ubisoft pull back amid rising costs, redundancies and ownership changes, a wave of smaller, independent publishers is emerging to back grassroots studios with more experimental ideas. The Guardian's Pushing Buttons column draws a parallel with 1990s independent cinema, when studios like Miramax and New Line Cinema revitalised Hollywood by championing distinctive directors, suggesting the games industry could be entering a similar period of creative renewal driven from outside the mainstream.
Recent examples include Kinetic Publishing, founded by the creator of Phasmophobia; Outersloth, the funding arm of Among Us developer InnerSloth, launched in 2024; and Kepler Interactive, the London-based publisher behind 2025's critically acclaimed Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. A new outfit, Inner Pocket, was announced last week to support "intimate and engaging" games. The article notes this shift is aided by digital distribution platforms such as Steam, cheaper social media marketing, and funding routes like regional arts bodies and developer collectives, though it cautions that discoverability remains a major challenge given the hundreds of new titles released on Steam each week.
- Big publishers retreat as costs rise and layoffs hit EA, Microsoft, Ubisoft
- Boutique indie publishers like Kepler and Outersloth are filling the gap
- Digital distribution and cheap marketing help, but discoverability remains tough
New here? Start with this
Big publishers such as Electronic Arts, Microsoft and Ubisoft have long had the money and reach to make and sell games around the world. Rising costs, job cuts and changes in ownership have put pressure on some of these companies, while smaller independent studios often have less funding and fewer ways to reach players.
Independent publishers aim to help those studios fund and release games that may be less familiar or more experimental. Examples include Outersloth, set up by the makers of Among Us, and Kepler Interactive, which published Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. Digital shops such as Steam have made it easier to sell games, but the large number of new releases makes it hard for players to find them.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Indie developers are emerging as gaming's creative force as major publishers retreat from innovation amid rising costs and creative exhaustion. Digital distribution and new funding models—indie publishers, arts bodies, developer collectives—have eliminated the need for corporate backing, whilst passionate communities champion independent work. The parallel to independent cinema is apt: when mainstream institutions stagnate, outsiders inject vital creativity and reshape the cultural landscape.
The case against
Indie games, though creatively valuable, are unlikely to dominate gaming's future. Major publishers retain decisive advantages in capital, console relationships, live-service infrastructure, and marketing reach, whilst the unresolved discoverability problem means most indie games fail commercially despite quality. Major publishers are consolidating rather than declining, and they continue to control the vast majority of industry revenue and distribution channels.
Art Celebrity Culture Entertainment Film Gaming Software Technology