The Medicare-for-all trade-offs socialists aren’t talking about, according to experts
- Socialist candidates push Medicare-for-all as a 2026 midterm campaign issue
- El-Sayed admits taxes would rise; other costs go unmentioned, experts say
- Cato's Michael Cannon calls Democrats' plan more radical than Canadian, European models
Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is among several socialist-aligned candidates centring their midterm campaigns on Medicare-for-all, a policy that promises universal healthcare but which experts say carries costs beyond the tax rises its advocates openly acknowledge. Fox News reports that even sympathetic proponents concede higher taxes would…