Trump handed Laura Loomer’s ‘terrifying’ new secret list of traitors as she worms her way back into his inner circle
Laura Loomer, a conservative journalist and Trump ally, says she brought the president a list of officials and hires she believes are undermining his agenda. Her access to Trump has renewed concerns among administration staff because officials she criticises may face dismissal, giving her influence over personnel decisions despite holding no government post.
Loomer said the list contains about ten people across the Justice and State departments and the National Security Council, but did not identify them. Trump praised her during a recent Alabama campaign trip, where she travelled with him on Air Force One and Marine One. In April 2025, Trump fired six National Security Council officials after meeting with her. Loomer has also faced criticism from Trump aides and Republican lawmakers over her past claims and controversial views.
- Loomer says she gave Trump a list of about ten officials.
- The names include staff in three major government bodies.
- Her influence has drawn both praise and criticism.
New here? Start with this
Laura Loomer is a conservative journalist and a long-time ally of Donald Trump who has gained close access to the president. She recently gave Trump a list of roughly ten officials she believes are undermining his agenda, located in the Justice Department, State Department, and National Security Council.
The concern is that Loomer has significant influence over who keeps their job, despite holding no formal government position. In April 2025, six National Security Council officials were removed from their posts shortly after Trump met with her, suggesting her criticism can directly lead to people losing their positions.
Loomer has been criticised by Trump's staff and Republican lawmakers over her past statements and views. Her apparent power to influence personnel decisions has raised concerns within the administration about proper procedures and accountability.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Presidents routinely consult trusted advisors from outside the formal government structure, and Trump has every right to make personnel decisions based on input from people whose judgment he values. If Loomer's assessment helps identify officials who are not committed to implementing his stated agenda, considering that perspective when making personnel decisions is a straightforward exercise of executive authority. A president's prerogative to surround himself with a team aligned with his vision is a standard and legitimate aspect of governance.
The case against
Government personnel decisions should flow through accountable institutional processes with proper oversight, not be determined by the influence of unelected private citizens beyond public scrutiny. When officials can be dismissed based on accusations from outside advisors rather than through transparent evaluation, it creates opportunities for personal grievance, ideological purges, and potential abuse of power. Sound governance requires that significant influence over state decisions be exercised through properly transparent and accountable channels.
Art Culture Elections Entertainment Government Horror Politics Travel World